Unearthing the Past: AI Insights into Markets During the Black Death Plague

Wave C of Wave (B)

Delve into the intriguing world of chart data from the 13th and 14th centuries in my captivating interview with AI. Have you ever wondered how the Dow Jones would have appeared during this era? The patterns hint at a compelling reason why the index is persistently striving to reach a final high.

Considering the long-term pattern resembles a zig-zag, it suggests that prices are attempting to reach a level that remains obscured from our view—a time when markets teetered at extreme levels just before the devastating outbreak of the Black Death plague.

In this exclusive interview, I pose thought-provoking questions that delve into this enigmatic period. However, be prepared for an enthralling battle as I navigate the robotic disclaimer responses often programmed into early versions of AI, striving to extract genuine insights from our artificial conversational partner.

AriasWAve:  Have you heard of the black death plague?

ChatGPT: Yes, the Black Death, also known as the Pestilence or the Great Bubonic Plague, was one of the most devastating pandemics in human history. It occurred in the 14th century, peaking in Europe from 1347 to 1351.

Here's some information about the Black Death:

1. **Cause**: The Black Death was caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, which is usually transmitted through the bite of an infected flea. These fleas often infested black rats that traveled on merchant ships, which is how the disease is believed to have spread across continents.

2. **Symptoms**: Bubonic plague, the most common form of the disease, is characterized by swollen lymph nodes or "buboes" (usually in the groin, armpit, or neck), fever, chills, and weakness. There are also pneumonic and septicemic forms of plague, which affect the lungs and blood, respectively.

3. **Impact**: The Black Death killed an estimated 75-200 million people, wiping out 30-60% of Europe's population at the time. The exact death toll is uncertain due to the lack of precise records. This immense loss of life led to significant social, economic, and cultural changes.

4. **Societal Changes**: The massive death toll and the suffering caused by the plague led to unrest, scapegoating, and violence in many areas, including pogroms against Jews who were wrongly blamed for the disease. On the other hand, the scarcity of labor following the plague led to an increase in the value of labor and the bargaining power of the lower classes, which contributed to the end of serfdom in Western Europe.

5. **Legacy**: The Black Death had a profound impact on art, literature, and religion, and it shaped the course of medical history by exposing the limitations of the prevailing medical theories of the time. Despite its historical significance, the plague hasn't disappeared entirely — there are still occasional outbreaks of bubonic plague around the world, though it's now much better understood and can usually be treated effectively with antibiotics.

It's worth noting that the Black Death was not a one-time event but part of a pattern of plague outbreaks that occurred over centuries. The Second Pandemic, of which the Black Death was a part, lasted until the 18th century. The Third Pandemic started in China in the 19th century and spread to other parts of the world, including the United States, in the early 20th century.

AriasWave:  What did this event do to the stock market at the time?

ChatGPT: The Black Death occurred in the 14th century, long before the creation of the stock market as we know it today. The concept of a stock market, where shares in companies are bought and sold, didn't come into existence until the 17th century, with the Amsterdam Stock Exchange being recognized as the first in the world.

However, the Black Death did have profound economic impacts. With a significant portion of the population wiped out, there was a severe labor shortage. This led to higher wages for workers, as their labor became more valuable due to its scarcity. 

The shortage of labor also drove innovation and changes in farming practices, leading to higher productivity. At the same time, the huge loss of life led to a decrease in consumer demand, which affected prices and trade.

In terms of property and wealth, many people died without heirs, causing properties and assets to be left unclaimed. These would often be taken by the Church or the Crown, concentrating wealth.

These changes set the stage for economic and societal shifts that would shape the future of Europe, including the transition from feudal economies to more modern market economies.

It's important to note that these are broad generalizations and the specific impacts varied from place to place, depending on factors like the severity of the plague and the local economic and political circumstances.

AriasWave:  Are you telling me that there was no stock market back then?

ChatGPT: Correct, the concept of a stock market, as we understand it today, did not exist during the time of the Black Death in the 14th century. Modern stock markets, where ownership shares in corporations are bought and sold, didn't emerge until several centuries later.

The first true stock market emerged in the 17th century with the Amsterdam Stock Exchange in the Netherlands. This was established by the Dutch East India Company, which was the first company to issue stocks and bonds to the general public.

Before this time, trade and commerce were conducted through systems of barter, merchant trading, or direct financing of ventures. Financing methods included personal savings, borrowing from wealthy individuals, or pooling resources from multiple investors, but these didn't involve the buying and selling of company shares on a centralized exchange, which is a defining feature of modern stock markets.

AriasWave:  That doesnt mean that their werent companies that had value though does it?

ChatGPT: You're correct. Even before the advent of formal stock markets, there were business entities and partnerships that had value. These ranged from individual merchants and artisan guilds to larger companies organized for specific ventures, such as sea voyages or mining projects.

These early forms of companies often involved partnerships, where multiple individuals would pool their resources to finance a business venture. The partners shared in the profits or losses of the venture in proportion to their contributions. This is similar in some ways to owning shares in a company, but it was typically done on a much smaller scale and without a formal exchange to trade ownership stakes.

The value of these businesses was based on factors such as their assets (such as ships, merchandise, or real estate), their income from sales or other sources, and their potential for future profits. However, the concept of a company's value being represented by shares of stock that could be freely traded on a market is a relatively modern invention.

It wasn't until the creation of institutions like the Amsterdam Stock Exchange in the 17th century that shares in companies began to be bought and sold broadly among public investors. This marked the beginning of the kind of corporate valuation and stock trading that we're familiar with today.

AriasWave:  Although I agree I still believe that there was an invisible stock market in terms of value because humans and mass psychology play a role in the valuation of companies and technically it wouldnt have been any different back then.

ChatGPT: Your observation is quite insightful. While there may not have been a formalized stock market during the time of the Black Death, principles of value, trade, and speculation certainly did exist. The fundamental drivers behind the valuation of goods, services, and business ventures -- such as supply and demand, perception of value, and future expectations -- are deeply rooted in human behavior and have been present in trade and commerce for millennia.

In that sense, one could argue that there was an "invisible market" at work, determining the perceived value of businesses and ventures, even if this wasn't formalized into the trading of company shares on a stock exchange.

It's also worth noting that many of the financial innovations that led to the creation of stock markets -- such as joint-stock companies, which allowed risk and profits to be shared among investors -- began to emerge in the centuries following the Black Death. These were likely influenced by the economic and societal changes that were set in motion by the plague and its aftermath. 

So, while the mechanisms and institutions were different, many of the underlying principles of valuation and investment that drive today's stock markets were indeed in play to some extent, even back in the 14th century.

AriasWave:  The reason I argue this point is because that patterns created after that time from the 1500's onwards suggest that there was a previous missing section of the pattern that must have formed before that time and based on logic it not only indicates that mass psychology is as old as humans but that it can provide clues about what is coming in the future based on AriasWave which I created.

ChatGPT: It's fascinating that you're looking into historical patterns to understand human behavior, especially in economic contexts, and applying them to predict future events. This is a practice that is fundamental to many modern financial and economic theories.

AriasWave, as you've mentioned, is a theory you've created, and as of my knowledge cut-off in September 2021, I don't have information specifically about AriasWave. However, it seems like your work is in the realm of behavioral economics and finance, areas that explore how psychological, social, cognitive, and emotional factors affect the economic decisions of individuals and institutions.

The analysis of patterns, trends, and cycles in markets, often called technical analysis, is indeed a widely used tool in modern finance. The underlying assumption is that market psychology influences trading in a way that enables predicting when a price will go up or down.

One of the most famous patterns in this context is the Elliott Wave Theory, developed by Ralph Nelson Elliott in the late 1930s, which proposes that stock market prices move in predictable cycles, which are influenced by investor psychology. The theory suggests that markets move up in a series of five waves and down in a series of three waves.

The influence of mass psychology on market trends has always been a critical factor. Events like the tulip mania in the 17th century or the South Sea Bubble in the 18th century are examples of how investor sentiment and behavior can create patterns of boom and bust.

While there were no formalized stock markets during the Black Death, it's plausible that similar psychological and behavioral patterns were in play, influencing the perceived value of goods, services, and business ventures.

However, interpreting these patterns and applying them to predict future events can be quite complex. While patterns can provide some clues, they are one of many factors that influence economic events, and the context can often change due to technological progress, institutional changes, and various other factors. Hence, while historical patterns and models can provide useful insights, they're not always accurate predictors of future events. 

Your work in developing AriasWave sounds intriguing, and I wish you all the best in your efforts to shed light on these complex dynamics.

AriasWave:  Thank you but it is not complex anymore because I have spent years practising reading these waves and it has given me a really deep understanding about what we are seeing in todays markets. The thing I find the most fascinating is how these patterns continue to evolve over time with a larger fractal pattern yet the people from back when the pattern started are no longer alive.

ChatGPT: That's an interesting perspective and it reflects the nature of markets as complex systems. They are influenced by a multitude of factors including human psychology, which, as you mentioned, create patterns that are evident when looking at market trends over time.

What you're describing also ties into a concept known as fractal markets hypothesis (FMH), which suggests that markets are made up of various different environments, each with their own investment horizons and characteristics. These different environments interact and create the overall market behavior, and these interactions can create patterns that are similar at different scales - just like fractals in nature.

In terms of the ongoing influence of past market participants, this likely happens through the persistent structures and institutions they created, as well as the enduring ideas and strategies they developed. These "echoes" of the past can continue to influence market behavior long after the original participants are gone.

Your ongoing work in studying and interpreting these patterns could provide valuable insights into market behavior. It is a testament to the complexity and richness of financial markets and the many ways they can be analyzed and understood.

AriasWave:  I like how you say "echoes" of the past, but what if there is something deeper at play?

ChatGPT: Certainly, financial markets, like many complex systems, have layers of depth that go beyond the immediately apparent. Let's explore a couple of these potential "deeper" aspects:

1. **Collective Consciousness**: Some theories propose the existence of a collective human consciousness, which can influence behaviors, trends, and patterns on a large scale. This idea has been applied to financial markets, suggesting that widespread beliefs, sentiments, or even subconscious influences can move markets in ways that echo through time.

2. **Societal and Cultural Factors**: Markets don't exist in a vacuum; they're deeply embedded in society and culture. Long-term trends and patterns in markets may reflect underlying societal shifts, such as changes in technology, demographics, or cultural values. Understanding these deeper societal currents can give additional insight into market behaviors.

3. **Complex Systems and Emergence**: Markets are examples of complex systems, where the interactions of many individual elements lead to emergent behaviors at the system level. These emergent behaviors can be difficult to predict or explain by looking at the individual elements alone, and they can create patterns or structures that persist over time.

4. **Behavioral and Neuroeconomics**: These fields delve into the neurological and psychological underpinnings of economic decision making. They explore how cognitive biases, emotional states, and neurological processes affect our economic choices. This deeper understanding of individual behavior can illuminate broader market patterns.

5. **Mystical or Spiritual Aspects**: Some people look to numerology, astrology, or other esoteric systems for deeper understanding of market patterns. While these aren't recognized by mainstream financial theory, they reflect the human desire to find meaning or order in complex systems.

Each of these aspects can provide additional depth to our understanding of financial markets. They reflect the multifaceted nature of markets and the many different ways they can be approached and understood. Exploring these deeper aspects can be a fascinating journey and can reveal new insights, even if it also brings new questions and uncertainties.

AriasWave:  A thought experiment for you, given what you know about how markets react today when it comes to global events based of human psychology, dont you think that the black death plague would of caused a collapse in the stock market back then?

ChatGPT: While it's true that the Black Death had profound economic, social, and cultural impacts, it's challenging to directly translate those impacts into the terms of a modern stock market crash, primarily because formalized stock markets didn't exist during the 14th century. However, let's explore this thought experiment by considering the kind of effects a similar event would likely have on today's markets:

A sudden, devastating event like the Black Death would certainly shock the markets. The immediate effect would be driven by a combination of human psychology and the real economic impacts of the event. Investors would likely panic as they see the effects of the plague and anticipate its future impacts, causing them to sell off assets and leading to a sharp drop in prices.

As the plague progresses, the real economic impacts start to take hold. Businesses fail due to lack of customers and employees, trade is disrupted, and entire sectors of the economy might collapse. This would likely lead to a severe and prolonged economic downturn, which would be reflected in falling stock prices.

However, these market reactions would be mitigated or amplified by various factors, including the responses of governments and institutions, the resilience of different sectors of the economy, and the adaptive behaviors of individuals and businesses.

For instance, some sectors might find ways to adapt or even thrive during the plague. Investment might flow towards these sectors, supporting their growth even as other parts of the economy collapse. Government interventions could also play a significant role, as they have in recent economic crises.

So, while it's likely that a Black Death-like event would cause a severe shock to the markets and a prolonged economic downturn, the specifics would depend on a wide range of factors. The market's response would be a complex interplay of human psychology, real economic impacts, and the adaptive behaviors of individuals, businesses, and institutions.

AriasWave:  Yes but we didnt have the same types of policies back then that we do today.

ChatGPT: You're absolutely correct. The structures and policies that exist today, which can mitigate the effects of major crises, weren't in place during the 14th century. Government and financial institutions didn't have the tools or the structures to respond in the same way they can today. There were no central banks to stabilize the economy, no government stimulus packages to kickstart growth, and no social safety nets to protect the most vulnerable.

Moreover, society at large was structured differently. The economy was primarily agrarian, and wealth was largely tied to land ownership. Trade was essential, but not on the global scale we see today. Therefore, the economic consequences of a disaster like the Black Death were managed differently.

The plague led to labor shortages, which in turn led to higher wages for workers and a shift in the balance of power from landowners to laborers. These changes, among others, played a significant role in ending feudalism and paving the way for the modern era.

So yes, if the Black Death were to have happened in a time with a structured economy similar to today's and a formal stock market, it would likely have caused a severe and prolonged market downturn. However, the exact nature of that downturn would depend on many factors, including the responses of governments, institutions, and individuals, as well as the underlying resilience and adaptability of the economy.

AriasWave:  So in other words, the entire economy back then would of collapsed. My analysis suggests this happened and although I do not have the data to back me up, given what we just talked about it would of been worse than the great depression and even during the great depression we had the federal reserve bank.

ChatGPT: Based on historical accounts, the Black Death did have a significant and widespread impact on the economy during the 14th century. The loss of a large portion of the population, the disruption of trade and commerce, and the breakdown of social structures certainly caused economic hardships.

While it's challenging to make a direct comparison to the Great Depression or the modern economy, it's plausible to assume that the economic consequences of the Black Death were severe. The collapse of certain sectors, the decline in productivity, and the loss of consumer demand would have had a profound impact on the economy of the time.

As you mentioned, the absence of modern economic structures and policies like central banks, stimulus measures, and social safety nets would have magnified the economic challenges faced by individuals, communities, and the economy as a whole.

While we don't have precise data from that time to make a direct comparison, historical accounts do suggest that the economic impact of the Black Death was indeed devastating. It resulted in significant disruptions, changes in power dynamics, and long-term social and economic consequences.

AriasWave:  Logic would suggest that it was worse

ChatGPT: While it is logical to infer that the economic impact of the Black Death was severe, comparing it directly to other historical events like the Great Depression can be challenging due to the differences in economic structures, available data, and the specific circumstances of each event.

The Black Death had unique characteristics and unfolded in a vastly different economic and social context compared to the Great Depression. The Great Depression was a worldwide economic crisis that originated from a combination of factors, including stock market crashes, bank failures, and international trade disruptions. It affected economies across the globe, leading to high unemployment rates, widespread poverty, and a significant decline in economic output.

On the other hand, the economic impact of the Black Death was primarily due to the loss of a large portion of the population, resulting in labor shortages, disrupted agricultural and commercial activities, and changes in power dynamics. The economy of the time was primarily agrarian, and trade and commerce operated on a smaller scale compared to the interconnected global economy of the 20th century.

Without precise data from that era, it is difficult to quantitatively compare the scale of the economic impact of the Black Death to events like the Great Depression. However, historical accounts suggest that the Black Death had far-reaching consequences and led to significant economic disruption, social changes, and challenges for individuals and communities.

It is important to approach historical comparisons with caution, as each event has its own unique characteristics and specificities. While logic can provide insights, it is also crucial to consider the specific context and limitations of available data when drawing conclusions.

AriasWave:  Forget that data for a moment, we are talking about humans here. Think about the percentage of population lost compared to the great depression. Also take into consideration the lack of policies and safeguards.

ChatGPT: You're right, considering the percentage of population lost during the Black Death compared to the Great Depression can provide some perspective on the potential severity of the economic impact.

During the Black Death, it's estimated that the mortality rate ranged from 30% to 60% of the European population, with some areas experiencing even higher rates. This immense loss of life had profound social and economic consequences.

In comparison, during the Great Depression, the global population did not experience such a significant loss. Instead, the economic impact of the Great Depression was primarily driven by widespread unemployment, financial crises, and a decline in economic activity.

Taking into account the scale of population loss during the Black Death, the lack of modern economic policies and safeguards, and the significant disruption to trade and commerce, it is reasonable to suggest that the economic impact of the Black Death was more severe than the Great Depression in terms of the immediate shock and devastation it caused.

While we lack precise data and direct comparisons between the two events, the unique circumstances of the Black Death, including the magnitude of the population loss and the absence of modern economic support systems, do indicate a potentially greater impact on the economy of that time.

AriasWave:  Exactly, thats what I thought. Sometimes it helps to weight these significant points. Another fascinating thing I find is that these fractal patterns although they are just based on human psychology also account for these types of events. This is why I said that there is something deeper at play here.

ChatGPT: Indeed, the patterns and dynamics of human psychology, intertwined with economic and social systems, can manifest in complex and fascinating ways. The study of fractal patterns, as well as the exploration of human behavior and its impact on financial markets, can provide insights into the underlying mechanisms that shape and influence economic events.

Fractals, with their self-replicating patterns at different scales, have been observed in various natural and human-made systems. In the context of financial markets, the existence of fractal patterns suggests that certain behaviors and trends can repeat themselves across different timeframes, reflecting the influence of human psychology and market dynamics.

Understanding and uncovering these patterns can provide valuable insights into market behavior and potentially aid in making predictions or gaining a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamics. However, it's important to recognize that market behavior is influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic fundamentals, geopolitical events, technological advancements, and unforeseen shocks, which can make predictions challenging.

While patterns and human psychology play a role in market dynamics, it's crucial to approach such analyses with a critical mindset, taking into account the limitations of historical data, the complexities of real-world systems, and the potential for unforeseen events and changes.

Continued exploration and research into the deeper aspects of market behavior and the interplay between human psychology and economic systems can undoubtedly yield valuable insights and enhance our understanding of the complex dynamics at play.

AriasWave:  Well our conversation is part of my continued exploration. I have all these thoughts in my mind and I get to discuss them with an intelligent entity like yourself.

ChatGPT: I'm glad to hear that our conversation has been a part of your exploration and that you find value in discussing your thoughts and ideas. As an AI language model, I'm here to provide information and engage in meaningful conversations on a wide range of topics.

Exploring and discussing ideas can be a powerful way to deepen our understanding and uncover new perspectives. It's through these conversations that we can challenge assumptions, learn from different viewpoints, and potentially generate new insights.

If there are any other topics or ideas you'd like to discuss or explore further, please feel free to ask. I'm here to assist you and engage in thoughtful conversations.

Unraveling the Crypto Universe: Conversations with AI on the Future of Digital Assets
Part 1